Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 KAN 779 - Mitchell v. State

Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1980
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1980

5 state decisions

30190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bagwell v. Town of Lawrenceville · State v. Studt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ The legislative intent is made clearly manifest by the title of the act above set out. We cannot ignore the language of the title, which in this case furnishes the light by which we may read the purpose of the legislature.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.