Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 MASSAPPCT 205 - Commonwealth v. Carter

Commonwealth v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Lanzetta v. State New Jersey · United States v. Batchelder · Rewis v. United States · Dwyer v. Globe Newspaper Co. · Multistate Legal Studies, Inc. v. Ladd, Register of Copyrights

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas — (i) bomb, (ii) grenade, (iii) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, (iv) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, (v) mine, or (vi) device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses; [and] (C) any combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device described in subparagraph (A) . . . and from which a destructive device may be readily assembled” (emphasis supplied). See 26 U.S.C. § 5845 (f) (2000) (similarly defining “destructive device”).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.