Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 MASSAPPCT 739 - Commonwealth v. Terzian

Commonwealth v. Terzian’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Commonwealth v. Randolph · Commonwealth v. Blood · Commonwealth v. D'Amour · Commonwealth v. Lykus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[I]t shall not constitute an interception for an investigative or law enforcement officer ... to record or transmit a wire or oral communication if the officer is a party to such communication or has been given prior authorization to record or transmit the communication by such a party and if recorded or transmitted in the course of an investigation of a designated offense as defined herein” (emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In Jarabek, while the wiretap evidence was suppressed, the live testimony of the person wearing the wire concerning the conversations was permitted.”) 4 . This complaint ignored the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.