Commonwealth v. Clemens’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Alphas · Commonwealth v. Kwiatkowski · Commonwealth v. Julien · Commonwealth v. Martinez · Commonwealth v. Bibbo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whoever willfully and maliciously engages in a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, shall be guilty of the crime of criminal harassment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.