¶1The requirement of the ordinance that 100% of the residents living within 200 feet of the 1 ‘ outer extremities of applicant’s property ” must consent to the proposed use was an unconstitutional grant of power, since the capricious exercise of a negative vote by one resident could defeat the application.
¶2The order and judgment dismissing information should be unanimously affirmed.
¶3Concur — Hogan, P. J., Gulotta and Glickman, JJ.
¶4Order and judgment affirmed.