¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2This case has been pending more than seventeen years and will be found reported, Parham v. Stith, 56 Miss. 465. There have been five consecutive verdicts for the defendant and hone for the plaintiff,, who now appeals from the fifth verdict against him. The record affirmatively shows that two at least of -the former verdicts *202have been set aside on the facts. The third verdict was set aside “because, as the order setting it aside recites, it was contrary,to the law and evidence,” and the fourth, “ because the evidence ivas insufficient to warrant a verdict for defendant.” It follows therefore under the statute, § 1719, Code 1880, that the present verdict can only be set aside, if at all, for error of law, and as has been several times decided by this court, that error must be evidenced by a special bill of exceptions, and the general bill of exceptions, if there be one, embodying the evidence, cannot be looked to for any purpose. Ray v. McCary, 26 Miss. 404; Bowers v. Ross, 55 Miss. 213; Tagert v. Baker, 57 Miss. 303. There was in this case no special bill of exceptions to anything done in the court below, and hence the judgment must be
¶3Affirmed.