Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 Mo. 82

State v. Roehm

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1875

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1875-10-15

The indictment pursues the language of the statute in every particular, and is good. (Wagn. Stat., 1090, § 27 ; Id. 504, § 35; State vs. Stubblefield, 32 Mo., 563.) The offense committed was indictable under the law, as it existed at the time the same was preferred. Wagn. Stat., 516. § 30. was re-enacted February 21,1871. (Vide Acts 1871, P- 34.) The offense, as appears from the indictment, was committed June 9th, 1872.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1875-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1946

9 state decisions

4018751880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wagner, Judge,

¶1delivered the. opinion of the court.

¶2The-indictment alleged that the defendant did on the 9th day of June, 1872, unlawfully sell fermented and distilled liquors on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday, contrary, etc.

¶3To this indictment the defendant demurred, on the ground that no offense was charged known to the law, and that the violation of the statute was not set forth with the certainty that the law required. This demurrer was sustained by the court.

¶4The statute declares that every person who shall expose for sale any goods, wares, or merchandise, or shall keep open any ale or porter house, grocery or tippling shop, or shall sell or retail any fermented or distilled liquor on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday, shall on conviction be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor, and fined not exceeding fifty dollars. (Wagn. Stat., 504, § 35.)

¶5The indictment followed the language of the statute in describing the offense and that was sufficient. The court there fore erred in sustaining the demurrer, and its judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded ;

the other judges concur.
/61/mo/82 · .json · Public domain