Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 NEB 100 - Gerner v. Yates

Gerner v. Yates’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
May 1932
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 1932

15 state decisions

601900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The verdict is an anomaly; it is in irreconcilable conflict with itself. It is in effect a declaration by the jury that the material allegations of the petition are both true and false.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.