Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 NEB 205 - Streeter v. Stalnaker

Streeter v. Stalnaker’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
10
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2008

4 federal appellate · 19 state decisions — followed in 10 states

8019011910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By this act (U. S. Rev. St. § 2477) the government consented that any of its lands not reserved for a public purpose might be taken and used for public roads. The statute was a standing offer of a free right of way over the public domain, and as soon as it was accepted in an appropriate manner by the agents of the public, or the public itself, a highway was established. McRose v. Bottyer, 81 Cal. 122 [ 22 Pac. 393 ]. What the Hamilton county authorities did was perhaps insufficient to show the establishment of a road under the general road law, but was enough, we think, to indicate an acceptance of the government's bounty, and that is all that was required to create an easement. * * *””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.