Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 NY2D 408 - People v. Dodt

People v. Dodt’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2005

10 state decisions

90198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Proof ... that defendant threatened the use of a gun is sufficient to establish ... threatened use of deadly physical force, even though there is no evidence that in fact he possessed an operable firearm.... ... ... Defendant argues ... that the proof was insufficient because it must be shown that the threat made was capable of present realization and there was no evidence at trial that he actually possessed a gun... The plain language of the statute requires rejection of defendant's argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It follows that when police have acted on the basis of a teletype or radio bulletin the prosecution's burden is not discharged absent proof regarding the contents of the communication received ... When a proper suppression motion is filed ... the content of the bulletin upon which the police acted, as opposed to its basis or source, must be proved at the hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “using or threatening to use deadly force”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.