People v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2006 · most notably Parke v. Raley (1993), State v. Wright (1986)
4 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pointer v. Texas · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Malloy v. Hogan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The clear import of Boykin and its progeny is that the Trial Judge has a vital responsibility “to make sure [that the accused]'has full understanding of what the plea connotes and of its consequence” [citing Boykin, 395 U.S. at 244 , 89 S.Ct. at 1712 ], not that a new procedural requirement has been imposed, mandating the Trial Judge’s ritualistic recitation of the rights waived upon a guilty plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pendleton v. Scully“knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hanson v. Phillips
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.