61 Ohio App. 3d 315 - Roach v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
37 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably 95 Ohio App. 3d 451 - Seegert v. Zietlow (1994), 85 Ohio App. 3d 50 - Morford v. Morford (1993)
37 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1673 · 26 U.S.C. § 1 (Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2008)
Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Kokoszka v. Belford · Windham Bank v. Tomaszczyk · Pugh v. Pugh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Accordingly, we find Assignment of Error No. II to be well-taken. We, therefore, reverse the trial court insofar as it orders Ford Motor Co. to withhold $839.46 from appellant's monthly pension benefits, and instruct the trial court to order withholding of no more than sixty percent of appellant's net disposable income.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(A) where such individual is supporting his spouse or dependent child (other than a spouse or child with respect to whose support such order is used), 50 per centum of such individual's disposable earnings for that week; and {¶ 19}”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[t]he purpose of contempt proceedings is to secure the dignity of the courts and the uninterrupted and unimpeded administration of justice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.