61 Ohio App. 3d 397 - Bobko v. Sagen’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 90 Ohio App. 3d 400 - Wozniak v. Wozniak (1993), 89 Ohio App. 3d 646 - Giurbino v. Giurbino (1993)
53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dehass · State v. Eley · State v. Brown · 40 Ohio St. 3d 75 - Corron v. Corron · 60 Ohio App. 2d 227 - Nolte v. Nolte
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In lieu of any order or in addition thereto, the court shall require the party failing to act or the attorney advising him or both to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, caused by the failure, unless the court expressly finds that the failure was substantially justified or that other circumstances make an award of expenses unjust.” (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness: * * * (5) Statement by a deceased or incompetent person. The statement was made by a decedent * * *, where all of the following apply: (a) the estate or personal representative of the decedent's estate * * * is a party; (b) the statement was made before the death * * *; (c) the statement is offered to rebut testimony by an adverse party on a matter within the knowledge of the decedent * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lance v. Boldman“[i]n an action to set aside a deed to a grantee who is in a relationship of trust and confidence with the grantor, there is a presumption that the transfer is invalid and the burden is on the grantee to establish that the transfer is valid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.