¶1 Appellant Kimberly Weber’s assignment of error is sustained. The authority to impose institutionalization to age twenty-one is permitted under R.C. 2151.355(A)(4) for the delinquent act committed and therefore probation with conditions, such as the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license, to age twenty-one in lieu of institutionalization would be proper. The juvenile court, however, lacked the authority to revoke appellant’s driver’s license for life under any section of R.C. 2151.355.
¶2*637 The judgment of the juvenile court is reversed, and since appellant has attained age twenty-one, the juvenile court judgment is vacated.
¶3 Judgment accordingly.