Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 OHIOST2D 155 - State v. Scott

State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Jenkins (1984), State v. Thomas (1988)

16 federal appellate · 73 state decisions

27019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · State v. Dehass · United States v. Matlock · Remmer v. United States · North Carolina v. Butler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] jury can infer an aider and abettor's purpose to kill where the facts show that the participants in a felony entered into a common design and either the aider or abettor knew that an inherently dangerous instrumentality was to be employed to accomplish the felony or the felony and the manner of its accomplishment would be reasonably likely to produce death.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An express written or oral statement of waiver of the right to remain silent or the right to counsel is usually strong proof of the validity of that waiver, but is not inevitably either necessary or sufficient to establish waiver. The question is not one of form, but rather whether the defendant in fact knowingly and voluntarily waived the rights delineated in Miranda.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““(A) No person, acting with the kind of culpability required for the commission of an offense, shall do any of the following: (I* * * “(2) Aid or abet another in committing the offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.