Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 OHIOST2D 285 - State v. Vondenberg

State v. Vondenberg’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Gaines (1989), Government of Virgin Islands v. Soto (1983)

4 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

24019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kowertz · State v. Meek · 14 Ohio App. 2d 7 - State v. Dye

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]or purposes of establishing the crime of aggravated robbery, a jury is entitled to draw all reasonable inferences from the evidence presented that the robbery was committed with the use of a gun * * *.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “any instrument, device, or thing capable of inflicting death, and designed or specially adapted for use as a weapon, or possessed, carried, or used as a weapon.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) "Firearm" means any deadly weapon capable of expelling or propelling one or more projectiles by the action of an explosive or combustible propellant. "Firearm" includes an unloaded firearm, and any firearm that is inoperable but that can readily be rendered operable. (2) When determining whether a firearm is capable of expelling or propelling one or more projectiles by the action of an explosive or combustible propellant, the trier of fact may rely upon circumstantial evidence, including, but not limited to, the representations and actions of the individual exercising control over the firearm.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.