Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 OHIOST2D 55 - Baab v. Shockling

Baab v. Shockling’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hawkins v. Ivy · 40 Ill. 2d 193 - Maki v. Frelk · 47 Wis. 2d 120 - Vincent v. Pabst Brewing Co. · Bissen v. Fujii · Peterson v. Culp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"When a motion for a directed verdict has been properly made, and the trial court, after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion is directed, finds that upon any determinative issue reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion upon the evidence submitted and that conclusion is adverse to such party, the court shall sustain the motion and direct a verdict for the moving party as to that issue.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.