State v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of Education (1994), State v. Elmore (2009)
1 federal appellate · 76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Smith · In re Williams · Carlisle v. Wishart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“applies only where there is ambiguity in or conflict between the statutes”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he phrase 'felony of the second degree' has only one purpose in R.C. Title 29: to indicate which provision of R.C. 2929.11(B) sets forth the punishment for that particular crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fittro“must employ both R.C. 2929.11(B) and the applicable section of Chapter 2925 when determining the penalty for an R.C. Chapter 2925 crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fittro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.