Januzzi v. Hickman’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 125 Ohio App. 3d 257 - First Bank of Marietta v. Mascrete (1998), Battery One-Stop Ltd. v. Atari Corp. (1994)
3 federal appellate · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marino v. Ortiz · State ex rel. Lipson v. Hunter · State ex rel. Jones v. Wilson · 146 Ohio St. 297 - Peoples Bank & Savings Co. v. Katz · LaGrass v. Credit Investment Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If a garnishee fails to answer as required by this section, answers and his disclosure is not satisfactory to the judgment creditor, or fails to comply with the order of the court to pay the money owed or deliver the property into court or give the bond authorized under division (B) of this section, the judgment creditor may proceed against the garnishee by civil action. Thereupon, such proceedings may be had as in other civil actions. Judgment may be rendered in favor of the judgment debtor in the garnishee’s possession, and for the costs of the proceedings against the garnishee.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the order to a garnishee to pay into court is merely preparatory to further proceedings. It does not finally determine the garnishee's liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.