(1972)’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1990
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 42 Wis. 2d 368 - State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. Cannon · Jessner v. State · Reichert v. Milwaukee County · Schultz v. Milwaukee County · Feavel v. City of Appleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“". . . Such determination should be made under sec. 59.15 (1), Stats., when the board, prior to the earliest time for the circulation of nomination papers, establishes the total annual compensation to be paid for the office. Prospective candidates are entitled to know precisely what compensation is attached to the office. Feavel v. Appleton (1940) 234 Wis. 483 , 488-490 , 291 N.W. 830 ; Schultz v. Milwaukee County (1947), 250 Wis. 18 , 22 , 26 N.W.2d 260 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is an officer during every hour of his term.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is not permitted to practice law privately.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.