Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 PACOMMW 152 - Cook v. Commonwealth

Cook v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Feingold v. Bell of Pennsylvania · Hollinger v. Department of Public Welfare · Bell v. Thornburgh · Flinn v. Pittenger · Preston v. City of Philadelphia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the legislature in enacting PERA was making a conscious effort to remove labor disputes from the judicial arena until all other possibilities for the resolution of the dispute have been exhausted. There are no facts recited in the instant case which would require this Court to usurp the exclusive jurisdiction vested in the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board by the legislature for the determination of unfair labor practice charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.