¶1We are of opinion that the questions raised by the assignments of error are correctly and adequately answered in the well-considered opinion filed by the learned president judge of the Common Pleas in discharging the rule for new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto. The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
61 Pa. Super. 611
Balthaser v. Bitner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 20, 1915
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1915-12-20
Appeal, No. 184, Oct. T., 1915, by Alfred J. Raubenhold, Garnishee, from judgment of O. P. Berks Co., Jan. T., 1914, No. 83, on verdict… Held: a verdict was directed finding that at the time of the attachment Eaubenhold had in his possession $1,242.00 in money belonging to Ella Bitner, defendant, subject to the process, whilst the bank had no money subject thereto belonging to either of the defendants. The question.now is whether the result as to Eaubenhold is right or not.
Affirmed · Decided 1915-12-20