¶1This is an appeal by the defendant from an order refusing to dismiss the libel for want of jurisdiction. Our opinion is that- this was an interlocutory order from which an independent appeal does not lie. See Richardson v. Richardson, 193 Pa. 279; Tobin v. Tobin, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 186. If the defendant does nothing in the meantime to remove his objection to the jurisdiction he will be entitled to raise it by appeal after final decree, *621but the order cannot be made the subject of an independent appeal prior thereto. The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.
61 Pa. Super. 620
Walsh v. Walsh
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 20, 1915
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1915-12-20
Appeal, No. 244, Oct. T. 1915, by defendant, from order of O. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1914, No. 2990, refusing to dismiss libel in divorce in case of Sarah Celeste Walsh v. John Early Walsh. Libel in divorce. Error assigned was in refusing to dismiss libel.
Relies on Richardson v. Richardson
Appeal quashed · Decided 1915-12-20