State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1975
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Byars v. United States · Hoyer v. State · United States v. Kaplan · 43 Ohio App. 257 - Bock v. City of Cincinnati · McMahan's Administratrix v. Draffen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““By his act of seizing and searching appellant’s automobile, without appellant’s permission or without lawfully issued warrant permitting said search and seizure, said sheriff directly violated appellant’s constitutional rights as guaranteed him by sections 9 and 11 of article 6 of the Constitution of South Dakota.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rigsbee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.