Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 S.D. 514 - Jamieson v. Gerth

Jamieson v. Gerth’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
December 1965
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1965

18 state decisions

601933194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chiles v. Rohl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““For the plaintiff to see this car approaching, then look to the north and see no car coming, then to proceed without again glancing to the south to observe this car which he had already noticed, does not, in our opinion, conform to that degree of care which is necessary for any reasonable man to observe when he is driving a motor vehicle and entering an intersection. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.