¶1 opinion for reversal of so much of order as gives Welch a preference, and order modified so as to give Mrs. McCahill a preference in payment next after Rogers.
¶2 All concur.
¶3 Ordered accordingly.
61 Sickels 654
12 N.E 709
Boyle v. . Boyle
Decided June 14, 1887
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1887-06-14
This was an action for partition. The premises were sold and the questions presented' here arose between claimants to the share of defendant Mansfield in the proceeds. A reference was had to determine their respective priority, in which it was decided that Andrew J. Rogers had the first lien, Henry J. Welch, the second lien, and the appellant Annie L. McCahill, the third lien.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1887-06-14
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1934
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →