Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 So. 3d 332

James v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 2006-04-28

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2010

3 state decisions

Relies on Davis v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-04-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Application for Rehearing

BASCHAB, Judge.

¶2Based on the reasoning set forth in Davis v. State, 9 So.3d 514 (Ala.Crim.App.2006), which is also being released today, we overrule the appellant’s application for a rehearing.

¶3APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.

¶4McMILLAN, P.J., and COBB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.

/61/so3d/332 · .json · Public domain