Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 SO3D 424 - Montijo v. State

Montijo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 981 So. 2d 449 - Martinez v. State · 33 So. 3d 756 - Mosansky v. State · Course v. Fox Wolff Const.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “THE COURT: ... A person is justified in using deadly force if he reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or the imminent commission of aggravated battery against himself or another. To prove the crime of aggravated battery, the State must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt.... [[Image here]] [THE STATE]: Your Honor, I’m sorry to object, but I was talking to the defense. There is a burden-shifting that’s not appropriate under aggravated battery here. It shouldn’t be the State must prove because that’s something the defense must prove under this part of the instruction. The defense would have to prove aggravated battery, I think— [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: That’s correct. [THE STATE]: — for self-defense. THE COURT: Do you want me to ask the jury to be taken out at this point? [THE STATE]: Well, no. I think that’s the — that’s the crime the defense is arguing he might have been trying to defend himself against, but it’s the defendant — I guess the burden is on the defendant, I believe, to prove that, not the State to prove what Matthew was doing. THE COURT: The burden is on the defendant to prove self-defense. [THE STATE]: Right. So there is a typo under that, which says the State must prove. It should be the defendant must prove or the defense must prove that. THE COURT: Okay. So I will strike through the word State, and I will write in the word defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “f, — imminent death or-- great — bodily harm to-[himself]-[herself-]-or-an-otheiyor & — the imminent-commission of (applicable — forcible—felony)—against [himself] [herself] [or another]^”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.