Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 SW2D 175 - Parkey v. Archer County

Parkey v. Archer County’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1985

4 state decisions

10193319401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that under the provisions of chapter 2, title 116, Rev.Statutes, the commissioners’ court may, upon their own initiative, order the laying out and opening of public roads when necessary and discontinue all or any roads when it shall be deemed expedient. Robison v. Whaley Farm Corporation, 120 Tex. 633 , 37 S.W.2d 714 ; 21 Tex.Jur., § 43, pp. 568-9.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.