Daniels v. Starnes’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1962
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas Midland Railroad v. Dean · 49 Tex. Civ. App. 514 - City of San Antonio v. Wildenstein · Skeeters v. Hodges · 30 Tex. Civ. App. 341 - Collins v. Clark · 58 Tex. Civ. App. 253 - Mullinax v. Pyron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Malice, in common acceptation, means ill will against a person; but in its legal sense it means -a wrongful act, done intentionally, without just causé or excuse.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kirk v. Marshall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.