Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 SW2D 581 - Pool v. Joy

Pool v. Joy’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 1970
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1970

9 state decisions

4019331940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennsylvania Co v. Chamberlain · Joske v. Irvine · Richardson v. D. S. Cage Co. · World Company v. Dow · Fort Worth Belt Railway Co. v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases of fraud, and in all cases of defalcation by public officers, suit may be brought in the county where the fraud was committed or where the defalcation occurred, or any of such suits may be brought where the defendant has his domicile.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.