Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 Tex. Crim. 205

134 S.W 687

Bird v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1911

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1911-02-08

<p>Keeping Disorderly House—Defective Recognizance—Jurisdiction.</p> <p>Where, upon appeal from a misdemeanor conviction, the recognizance failed to name the court in which appellant was convicted and the amount of punishment imposed by the verdict, the same must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1931

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1911-02-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HARPER, Judge.

¶1 —The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the recognizance is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon this court in that the same does not name the court in which appellant was convicted, nor does it state the amount of the punishment imposed by the verdict of the jury, as require^ by article 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and decisions of this court construing this article. An inspection of the recognizance shows that it is defective in this respect, wherefore the motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

¶2 Dismissed.

/61/texcrim/205 · .json · Public domain