Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 Tex. Crim. 301

135 S.W 126

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1911

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1911-02-22

<p>Local Option—Statement of Facts—Original—Practice on Appeal.</p> <p>In felony cases the statement of facts must be made out and filed in duplicate, and on appeal the original must be sent to the Court of Criminal Appeals; and where the statement of facts is copiad in the transcript the same will not be considered.</p>

Decided 1911-02-22

HARPER, Judge.

¶1 —Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted in the District Court of Grayson" County, charged with a violation of the local option law, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

¶2 The Assistant Attorney-General has filed a motion to strike out the statement of facts, which is copied in the transcript. The Acts of the Thirty-first Legislature require that in felony cases the statement of facts shall be made out and filed in duplicate, and the original shall be sent to this court on appeal. The Legislature had evidently two objects in view. One that mistakes in copying it would be avoided, and we would have a correct statement; second, copying statement of facts in the record has been an item of enormous cost to the State, and the Legislature wanted to stop this drain on the treasury, both objects being commendable. The motion is sustained, and the statement of facts is stricken from the record.

¶3 In the absence of a statement of facts, this court presumes that the law and all the law, applicable to any state of facts that might be proven under the indictment, has been properly presented in the charge. Judgment affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/61/texcrim/301 · .json · Public domain