Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 U.S. 176 - Leitensdorfer v. Webb

Leitensdorfer v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

61 U.S. 176 · 1857

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
November 1988
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 4 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1988 · most notably Kepner v. United States (1904), De Lima v. Bidwell (1901)

37 federal appellate · 4 district · 17 state decisions

22018571860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It may not be unworthy of remark, that it is very unusual, even in cases of conquest, for the conqueror to do more than to displace the sovereign and assume dominion over the country. The modern usage of nations, which has become law, would be violated; that sense of justice and of right which is acknowledged and felt by the whole civilized world would be outraged, if private property should be generally confiscated, and private rights annulled. The people change their allegiance; their relation to their ancient sovereign is dissolved; but their relations to each other, and their rights of property, remain undisturbed. If this be the modern rule even in cases of conquest, who can doubt its application to the case of an amicable cession of territory? Had Florida changed its sovereign by an act containing no stipulation respecting the property of individuals, the right of property in all those who became subjects or citizens of the new government would have been unaffected by the change.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ The legislative power of the territory shall extend to all rightful subjects of legislation, consistent with the constitution of the United States and the provisions of this act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.