State v. Craddick’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 1976
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Jackson · Jordan v. Osgood · State v. Bokien · State v. Gottfreedson · Yakima Valley Bank v. McAllister
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In that case, State v. Bokien and State v. Gottfreedson were approved. But there was no attempt to overrule the case of State v. Pittam, 32 Wash. 137 , 72 Pac. 1042 , where it was held that, in a prosecution for embezzling funds of an employer, evidence of other acts of the defendant, in giving receipts to patrons of his employer and making entries on the books for less amounts than the money received, was adjnissible for the purpose of showing a general scheme which he adopted in keeping his employer’s accounts, as tending to show a system employed on his part in furthering such embezzlement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Downer““A thief will not be accorded immunity by the law by simply returning the stolen property when he finds that his crime has been discovered.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.