State v. McDougal’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 99 Wash. 2d 373 - Diamond v. Cross · 112 Wash. 2d 347 - State v. Neher · 110 Wash. 2d 793 - In Re the Personal Restraint of King · 113 Wash. 2d 83 - State v. Shove · 109 Wash. 2d 29 - State v. Stannard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the legislature has not adopted specific guidelines for the length of sanctions for various violations, the imposition of sanctions should be evaluated with reference to the standard range of the original offense. Rarely should the time to be served for violations exceed the underlying standard range.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[e]nsure that the punishment for a criminal offense is proportionate to the seriousness of the offense and the offender's criminal history”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]enalties for multiple violations occurring prior to the hearing shall not be aggregated to exceed thirty days' confinement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.