61 Wash. App. 915 - State v. Kitchen’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2001
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 113 Wash. 2d 679 - State v. Leach · 91 Wash. 2d 342 - State v. Boyer · 104 Wash. 2d 315 - State v. Holt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) do the necessary facts appear in any form, or by fair construction can they be found, in the charging document; and, if so, (2) can the defendant show that he or she was nonetheless actually prejudiced by the inartful language which caused a lack of notice?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.