Haseltine v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis
1884
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1927
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cord v. Southwell · Andrews v. Welch · Stansell v. Corning · Smith v. Hart · Bonesteel v. Bonesteel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To construe this or similar statutes of limitation, too much stress must not be given to such words as ‘rendition’ or ‘entry,’ as applied to the judgment. In sec. 3039, R. S., both of these terms are used to designate the same time. The time of appeal or writ of error ‘is limited to two years from the entry of such judgment, except when the party is under disability .when such judgment is rendered, or at the time of the rendition thereof,’ etc. They are here used interchangeably. . . . Many other statutes may be found where the same or other words are used, and they may have the same or a different meaning as they are used in the statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Netherton v. Holton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.