Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 Wis. 2d 220 - State v. Jakubowski

61 Wis. 2d 220 - State v. Jakubowski’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably 104 Wis. 2d 700 - State v. Fillyaw (1981), 96 Wis. 2d 106 - State v. Mendoza (1980)

26 state decisions

1401973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cawker v. Dreutzer · 54 Wis. 2d 220 - State v. Omernik · Henry S. Cooper, Inc. v. Town of Pleasant Prairie · 24 Wis. 2d 476 - State Ex Rel. Jenkins v. Fayne · Sturm v. Duel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a proceeding under sec. 343.305 is a special proceeding and must be so defined.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'has no jurisdiction to do anything other than dismiss the appeal.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If the tribunal from which an appeal is taken had no jurisdiction of the subject matter and the court to which the appeal is taken has such jurisdiction, the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was commenced in the good faith and belief that the first named tribunal possessed jurisdiction, allow it to proceed as if originally commenced in the proper court and shall allow the pleadings and proceedings to be amended accordingly; and in all cases in every court where objection to its jurisdiction is sustained the cause shall be certified to some court having jurisdiction, provided it appears that the error arose from mistake. [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.