Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

610 F.2d 438

Docket No. 77-1560.

Automobile Club of Michigan v. National Labor Relations Board

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 11, 1979.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1979-12-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1979

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-12-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*439Kalvin M. Grove, Burton L. Reiter, Fox & Grove, Lawrence M. Cohen, Chicago, 111., Theodore Souris, Bodman, Longley, Bogle, & Dahling, Detroit, Mich., for petitioners.

¶2Elliott Moore, Marjorie S. Gofreed, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Christopher Kat-zenbach, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Bernard Gottfried, Director, Region 7, N.L. R.B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent.

¶3Robert McWhorter, Kalamazoo, Mich., John H. Morad, Bolanowski, Brennan & O’Toole, Warren, Mich., for intervenor.

¶4Before WEICK, CELEBREZZE and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.

¶5ORDER

¶6This case is before the court on petition to review and cross-petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding petitioners in violation of § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1). The Board predicated its conclusions on a finding that petitioner discharged certain employees for issuing a press release concerning a lawsuit which they had filed against petitioners. The Board concluded that the issuance of this press release was a protected concerted activity under § 7 of the Act and that petitioners’ discharge of these employees for engaging in that activity violated § 8(a)(1) of the Act. The Board’s decision and order is reported at 231 NLRB No. 99 and these petitions are properly before the court since the alleged unfair labor practice occurred in Detroit, Michigan. 29 U.S.C. §§ 160(e) and (f).

¶7This court, having reviewed the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties and the court being fully advised in the premises finding the Board’s findings to be supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, its inferences fair, and its conclusions not contrary to law, Accordingly,

¶8It is ORDERED that the decision and order of the Board be and hereby is enforced in full.

/610/f2d/438 · .json · Public domain