Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 610 F.2d 521 - United States v. Boyd

United States v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis

610 F.2d 521 · 1979

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

97 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2014 · most notably Clark v. United States (1980), United States v. Lewis (1985)

97 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

68019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · California v. Civil Aeronautics Board · Schaffer v. United States · Roberts v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The mere fact that there is hostility among the defendants, or one defendant may try to save himself at the expense of another is not sufficient grounds to require separate trials.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Severance becomes necessary [only] where the proof is such that a jury could not be expected to compartmentalize the evidence as it relates to separate defendants.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “charged in a conspiracy should be tried together, particularly where proof of the charges against the defendants is based upon the same evidence and acts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.