Aponte v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
610 F.3d 1 · 2010
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Ke Zhen Zhao v. United States Department of Justice · Kucana v. Holder · Daneshvar v. Ashcroft · Zheng Zheng v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A 'material error of law automatically constitutes an abuse of discretion.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the BIA must . . . make certain that [the petitioner] receives the full benefit of the administrative process that Congress has elected to provide for [him]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dorce v. Garland“courts should not decide constitutional issues when this can be avoided”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dorce v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.