Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 610 F.3d 364 - Junkert v. Massey

Junkert v. Massey’s Empirical Analysis

610 F.3d 364 · 2010

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Malley v. Briggs · United States v. Lamon · United States v. Koerth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “officer who relies on a subsequently invalidated warrant may be liable for § 1983 damages only if the warrant application was 'so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence unreasonable.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the affidavit is so plainly deficient that any reasonably well-trained officer would have known that his affidavit failed to establish probable cause and that he should not have applied for the warrant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “courts have clearly held that a materially similar affidavit previously failed to establish probable cause under facts that were indistinguishable from those presented in the case at hand”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.