Ebert v. Gaetz’s Empirical Analysis
610 F.3d 404 · 2010
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Illinois v. Gates · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court considered the statement at a suppression hearing, not . . . trial; the Confrontation Clause was not implicated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The officers must have more than a bare suspicion that they have the right guy ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.