Sherley v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
610 F.3d 69 · 2010
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 20 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co. · Hardin v. Kentucky Utilities Co. · Louisiana Energy & Power Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“relies on economic logic to conclude that a plaintiff will likely suffer an injury-in-fact when the government acts in a way that increases competition or aids the plaintiff's competitors”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“actual or imminent increase in competition, which increase ... will almost certainly cause an injury-in-fact.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the Guidelines have intensified the competition for a share in a fixed amount of money, the plaintiffs will have to invest more time and resources to craft a successful grant application. That is an actual, here-and-now injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.