King v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2014
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · 157 Ind. App. 218 - Gibson v. Miami Valley Milk Producers, Inc. · State Ex Rel. Dean v. Tipton Circuit Court · 182 Ind. App. 308 - Stewart v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may be effected by any act by which a person recognizes the case as being in court, such as by filing an answer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] party who makes no appearance is not entitled to notice of the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Inlo service need be made on parties in default for failure to appear ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.