Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 610 NE2D 284 - Sedberry v. State

Sedberry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2010

8 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dowell v. State · Williams v. State · Leonard v. State · Martin v. State · Kirkham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the trial court must establish a record showing that the defendant was aware of the nature, extent, and importance of the right and the consequences of waiving it. Merely informing the defendant of his constitutional rights is insufficient.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “It seems to me that there can be no more critical stage of a criminal proceeding than the decision to plead guilty and waive one's right to a trial by the court or a jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.