Fuss v. Franks’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2011
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bon v. Lemp · Ide v. United States · Scherling v. Kilgore · Rock Creek Ditch & Flume Co. v. Miller · Salmeri v. Salmeri
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We held in Ranger Insurance Company v. Cates, Wyo., 501 P.2d 1255, 1259 (1972), that estoppel must be pleaded (Rule 8(c), W.R.C.P.) with precision and certainty, provided, however, that the defense may be relied upon even though not pleaded in so many words where the allegations amount to an estoppel. There was no pleading of estoppel, nor were there allegations amounting to es-toppel in this case. We will, therefore, not consider the point.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Prazma v. Kaehne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.