Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 610 So. 2d 129 - State v. Williams

610 So. 2d 129 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2016

10 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Valery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The portion of the judgment of the court of appeal reversing the conviction of possession of stolen property valued at $500.00 or more is affirmed, but the case is remanded to the district court for entry of a judgment of conviction of possession of stolen property valued at less than $100.00 and for resentenc-ing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must be given the broadest possible construction, including any conceivable thing of the slightest value, movable or immovable. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.