Troyer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2019
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 204 So. 2d 925 - Keesee v. State · 585 So. 2d 424 - McAtee v. McAtee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“discrepancy exists between the offense designated in the information heading and the crime depicted in the body of the instrument, the offense described in the body is the one with which the defendant is charged.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. State · Castillo v. State“[The defendant's] conduct, although perhaps prohibited by some other statute, is neither condemned by section 319.33, nor described in the main portion of the information. Although [the defendant] did not raise the error either at trial or on appeal, we find a conviction for a crime that never occurred fundamentally erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. State“but the body of the information charged a violation of section 319.33, Florida Statutes, which proscribed obtaining certificates of title by fraud. See id. at 531 . This court stated:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.